Apple tax: Irish tax criticisms ‘unfair’ says Noonan

Michael NoonanImage copyright

Image caption

Michael Noonan said Apple had not been shown favouritism by the Republic of Ireland

Critics of Ireland’s tax regime are drawing outdated and unfair caricatures, the Republic’s Finance Minister Michael Noonan has said.

The Irish parliament has been recalled early to debate the European Commission’s ruling that the country granted undue tax benefits of up to €13bn (£11bn) to Apple.

It follows the decision by the Irish government to appeal the ruling.

Mr Noonan said Apple had not been shown favouritism.

Analysis: BBC News NI Dublin correspondent Shane Harrison

Today’s vote was always going to be a foregone conclusion once the main opposition party, Fianna Fail, indicated it would support the government motion in appealing the European Commission’s Apple ruling.

It will mean that Enda Kenny’s Fine Gael minority government, supported by Independents, will go to the courts in Luxembourg with the diverse support of the Irish parliament.

It will argue that it did nothing wrong and did not collude with Apple in a secret sweetheart deal, to help it avoid paying taxes in other countries.

But Sinn Féin and hard-left politicians and parties disagree and say the government should pocket the Apple money plus interest, and spend it on social services that have been reduced because of austerity.

While there is little sympathy for Apple and the low amounts of tax it has paid globally for those supporting the government, it comes down to short-term monetary gain or protecting the Republic of Ireland’s good business name in the longer term.

The appeal will go ahead but it may be up to six years before we know the outcome.

“It is simply untrue that Ireland provided favourable treatment to Apple,” said the finance minister.

“The reaction to the European Commission’s decision has, at times, painted an outdated and unfair caricature of Ireland’s position on tax.

“This is a caricature that is at odds with the evidence and which overlooks our proven track record in recent years.

“The facts show our constructive engagement at the international table, with matchless implementation of reforms ahead of many of our partner countries.”

Image copyright

Image caption

Micheál Martin said the European Commission had made an assertion not backed by any evidence

He said the European Commission ruling encroached on sovereign states’ decisions on tax and contained contradictions on where Apple owed tax.

‘No selective treatment’

Micheál Martin, leader of Fianna Fail, said it had not been shown that there had been “selective treatment for one company”.

“A five-year investigation, including an unprecedented and targeted trawl of revenue files, has produced an assertion, but no evidence,” he told the debate.

However, Sinn Féin leader Gerry Adams said there had to be fairness in taxation.

“There can’t be one set of rules for some and different rules for others, with small and medium sized enterprises – the backbone of our economy – weighed down by government tax policies, while one very large company pays less than 1% corporation tax.”

On Tuesday night, Dáil (parliament) members were given a 16-page Department of Finance document on the background to the ruling.

The ruling itself is confidential.

How Apple was taxed in Ireland in 2011

In 2011, as in previous years, every Apple product sold in Europe, Middle East, Africa and India was recorded as a sale by Apple Sales International in Ireland.

Under its tax arrangement, Apple Sales International then allocated the vast majority of its profits to a head office. According to the EU Commission, this head office existed “only on paper” and therefore its profits were not taxed. Only a small percentage of profits were allocated to the Irish branch of Apple Sales International.

As a result, the final 10 million euros tax paid by Apple was equivalent to a rate of 0.05% – this fell to 0.005% by 2014 as profits rose – far less than the 12.5% Ireland charges other companies.

Another company, Apple Operations Europe, also based in Ireland, operated in a similar way.

‘Absolutely unbelievable’

Richard Boyd Barrett of People Before Profit told the Dáil it was “a farce” that the debate was being held despite the fact that members could not see the full European ruling.

“It’s absolutely unbelievable that we’re going to make a decision that has enormous implications for this state – to say no to 13bn euros – and we have not even got access to the ruling,” he said.

Previously, Apple chief executive Tim Cook said he was “very confident” the ruling would be overturned on appeal.

He called the European Commission’s decision “maddening” and “political”.


demanded in back taxes. Equal to:

  • ALL of Ireland’s healthcare budget

  • 66% of its social welfare bill

  • 15 million iPhones

  • 27% of Apple’s 2015 profit

However, European Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager rejected Mr Cook’s claims.

Image copyright
Getty Images

Image caption

Apple intends to appeal the European Commission’s ruling demanding it pays €13bn in taxes to Ireland

She said it was “a decision based on the facts of the case, looking into Apple Sales International, how they are arranged within Ireland, and the profits recorded there”.

comments powered by Disqus