Kimberley Strassel: Under Hillary, State and the Clinton Foundation were one seamless entity

This is the week that the steady drip, drip, drip of details about Hillary Clinton’s server turned into a waterfall. This is the week that we finally learned why Mrs. Clinton used a private communications setup, and what it hid. This is the week, in short, that we found out that the infamous server was designed to hide that Mrs. Clinton for three years served as the U.S. Secretary of the Clinton Foundation.

In March this column argued that while Mrs. Clinton’s mishandling of classified information was important, it missed the bigger point. The Democratic nominee obviously didn’t set up her server with the express purpose of exposing national secrets—that was incidental. She set up the server to keep secret the details of the Clintons’ private life—a life built around an elaborate and sweeping money-raising and self-promoting entity known as the Clinton Foundation.

Had Secretary Clinton kept the foundation at arm’s length while in office—as obvious ethical standards would have dictated—there would never have been any need for a private server, or even private email. The vast majority of her electronic communications would have related to her job at the State Department, with maybe that occasional yoga schedule. And those Freedom of Information Act officers would have had little difficulty—when later going through a email—screening out the clearly “personal” before making her records public. This is how it works for everybody else.

Mrs. Clinton’s problem—as we now know from this week’s release of emails from Huma Abedin’s private Clinton-server account—was that there was no divide between public and private. Mrs. Clinton’s State Department and her family foundation were one seamless entity—employing the same people, comparing schedules, mixing foundation donors with State supplicants. This is why she maintained a secret server, and why she deleted 15,000 emails that should have been turned over to the government.

To continue reading Kimberly Strassel’s column in the Wall Street Journal, click here.

The latest headlines on the 2016 elections from the biggest name in politics. See Latest Coverage →

Kimberley Strassel is a member of the Wall Street Journal editorial board, based in Washington. Since 2007 she has written the Potomac Watch column and has worked for the Wall Street Journal in Brussels, London, and New York. She is the author of the new book, “The Intimidation Game: How the Left Is Silencing Free Speech” (Twelve, June 21, 2016).  Follow her on Twitter @KimStrassel.  

comments powered by Disqus