A judge is expected to deliver a verdict in the corruption trial of Canadian ex-senator Mike Duffy.
Canadian prosecutors argued that the ally of former Prime Minister Stephen Harper kept a “slush fund” for illegitimate expenses.
Mr Duffy faces 31 charges, including bribery, fraud and breach of trust, and has denied them all.
He is accused of improperly claiming expenses related to a home in Ottawa, the Canadian capital.
He was charged in 2014 and his trial has been going on for nearly a year.
Mr Duffy has argued that his expenses claims were within government guidelines for reimbursement of senators who live outside of Ottawa but have to have a residence there.
The 31 charges relate to the following:
- Improper expenses related to the residence in Ottawa
- Claiming reimbursement for expenses unrelated to Senate business
- His alleged awarding of consulting contracts and using funds from the contracts for his personal gain
- A C$90,000 ($83,747; £48,960) payment to Mr Duffy made by Mr Harper’s former chief of staff, Nigel Wright, for the purpose of repaying the government for improperly claimed expenses
Mr Duffy testified for eight days as the sole witness in his case.
Some of the services Mr Duffy received by paying through his friend, Gerald Donohue, include a personal trainer and makeup artist.
Mr Duffy’s defence lawyer, Donald Bayne, argued in his closing statement that the case was “thin” and “insubstantial” and called the prosecution “unprepared” for the trial.
He has claimed that Mr Duffy’s actions were legitimate under Senate rules that were vague, and that he did not break the law.
Canadian senators are appointed by the governor general of Canada – the Queen’s representative – on the advice of the prime minister.
They typically join either the government caucus or the opposition caucus, or sit as independents.