Hillary Clinton has dismissed as “ridiculous” a charge by Bernie Sanders that she is “unqualified” to be president, as tensions rise in the Democratic race.
The Vermont senator stood by his comments, pointing to her Wall Street links and her vote for the war in Iraq.
He said she started the latest war of words by attacking him first.
The two candidates will do battle in a New York showdown in two weeks, a state where both have strong links.
There is much at stake, as the former secretary of state tries to stem the momentum of the self-described democratic socialist, who has a string of wins behind him.
Mr Sanders beat Mrs Clinton in the Wisconsin primary contest on Tuesday, and could pick up more delegates in Wyoming on Saturday before the greater prize of New York is up for grabs.
Analysis – Anthony Zurcher, BBC News, Washington
Is it a sign of desperation from a losing campaign or a proportional response to an earlier unfair attack? Whatever the reason, Bernie Sanders’s recent criticisms of Hillary Clinton as “unqualified” for the presidency represent a marked escalation in the war of words between the two candidates.
Mrs Clinton’s supporters are bristling at the remarks, which they consider both sexist and patently untrue, given the former secretary of state’s weighty political biography.
The Vermont senator’s point, however, is that Mrs Clinton’s lengthy experience within the establishment isn’t a mark in her favour, it’s a flaw that makes her beholden to the special interests he has spent his campaign denouncing.
With what could be a decisive New York primary less than two weeks away, the battle lines are clearly forming and the rhetoric is only just starting to heat up.
Democrats often boast of the substantiveness of their presidential nomination contest, particularly compared to the ongoing Republican slugfest.
This relatively genteel atmosphere may not persist through a rough-and-tumble contest in the Empire State, however, with its tabloid media culture that trumpets every squawk and squabble. In the political pressure cooker that is New York politics, things may be about to take an ugly turn.
The latest row began on Wednesday when Mrs Clinton was asked if Mr Sanders was qualified to be president, after he gave a newspaper interview in which he appeared to struggle to answer some questions.
“I think he hadn’t done his homework and he’d been talking for more than a year about doing things that he obviously hasn’t really studied or understood, and that does raise a lot of questions,” she told MSNBC’s Morning Joe.
On Wednesday night, Bernie Sanders told a crowd of supporters at Temple University that Mrs Clinton had accused him of being unqualified.
“Well let me, let me just say in response to Secretary Clinton, I don’t believe that she is qualified if she is, through her super PAC [fundraising committee], taking tens of millions of dollars in special interest funds,” he said.
“I don’t think you are qualified if you get $15 million from Wall Street through your super PAC.”
He went on to list her backing of the Iraq War and her support of trade agreements as other disqualifications. On Thursday, he repeated his comments.
The Clinton campaign hit back, with spokesman Brian Fallon tweeting: “Hillary Clinton did not say Bernie Sanders was ‘not qualified.’ But he has now, absurdly, said it about her. This is a new low.”
One of her senior aides, Christina Reynolds, said it was “a ridiculous and irresponsible attack for someone to make” against one of the most qualified candidates ever to run.
On the campaign trail, Mrs Clinton told Politico she explains things in a way more “open and truthful than my opponent,” and said she explains what she would do as president rather than “lots of arm-waving and hot rhetoric”.
In the Republican race, the two front-runners Ted Cruz and Donald Trump also traded insults on the campaign trail in New York.
Mr Trump, a businessman with no experience of elected office, accused the Texas senator of “hating” the city when he accused Mr Trump of having “New York values”.
The hashtag was trending on Twitter and Facebook after Mr Sanders’ comments, started by a Clinton supporter. It was meant to be supportive, but not all of the tweets showed Mrs Clinton in a positive light: