Sarkozy under formal investigation

Nicolas Sarkozy in February 2016Image copyright

Image caption

Nicolas Sarkozy was taken for questioning over spending in his 2012 re-election campaign

French ex-President Nicolas Sarkozy has been placed under formal investigation in a probe into his campaign funding, prosecutors say.

It relates to spending in his unsuccessful 2012 bid for re-election when his campaign costs were more than twice the legal limit.

Mr Sarkozy, 61, was questioned all day on Tuesday by magistrates before being informed he was under investigation.

He has repeatedly denied knowledge of the overspending.

He has said he was not involved in the details of his campaign finance.

The move is a prelude to a possible trial but does not necessarily mean Mr Sarkozy will be prosecuted. The questioning is seen as a blow to his attempts to regain the presidency of the country in the 2017 elections.

Mr Sarkozy is the head of France’s centre-right The Republicans political party (previously the UMP) and was the president of France from 2007 to 2012.


Mr Sarkozy was also designated as an “assisted witness” in connection with “accusations of using false documents, fraud and breach of trust”, prosecutors added.

Four senior figures in Mr Sarkozy’s 2012 campaign, including his campaign manager and treasurer, have previously been placed under formal investigation in relation to what has come to be known as the Bygmalion scandal.

It is alleged that millions of euros in false invoices were issued by the Bygmalion PR company, which organised some of Mr Sarkozy’s appearances during his campaign.

Bygmalion allegedly charged 18.5m euros (£14.4m, $21m) to the party instead of to the Sarkozy campaign, allowing the campaign to greatly exceed the spending limit of 22.5m euros (£17.5m, $25m)

Bygmalion is run by friends of Jean-Francois Cope, who led the UMP party for a short time between Mr Sarkozy’s separate tenures. He stood down in 2014 after the allegations were made public.

Mr Cope, who has been declared to be a witness in the case, also denies any knowledge of the false invoices.

comments powered by Disqus